🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and families are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

In Europe, a growing group of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that phones and apps are "robbing our kids' innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to pass a proposal lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended parents to restrict their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the move does not enact binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a good foundation," commented one MEP behind the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. One foundation established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when users turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are safe and fit for young users," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is largely happening at the state government level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further access needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring guardian approval for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain individuals to mimic this path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Outside of these regions, additional nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, international bodies take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The body notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in safety.

As this global conversation unfolds, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers around the world are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.